<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LiteratureInContext/LiC-data/development/schema/LiC_schema_4.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="johnson-rambler-4">

    <!--TEI Header -->
    <teiHeader>

        <fileDesc>
            <!--BEGINS File Description -->
            <titleStmt>
                <title type="main">The Rambler No. 4</title>
                <author>
                    <persName type="lcnaf" key="n78095825">
                        <name>
                            <forename>Samuel</forename>
                            <surname>Johnson</surname>
                        </name>
                    </persName>
                </author>
                <editor>
                    <persName type="orcid" key="0000-0002-7400-4093">
                        <name ref="editors.xml#TH">
                            <surname>Howe</surname>
                            <forename>Tonya</forename>
                        </name>
                    </persName>
                </editor>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Transcription, correction, editorial commentary, and markup</resp>
                    <name ref="editors.xml#MUstudstaff">Students and Staff of Marymount
                        University</name>
                </respStmt>
                <sponsor/>
                <funder>National Endowment for the Humanities</funder>
            </titleStmt>


            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>Literature in Context</publisher>
                <address>
                    <addrLine>Marymount University Department of Literature and Languages</addrLine>
                    <addrLine>2807 N. Glebe Road</addrLine>
                    <addrLine>Arlington, VA </addrLine>
                    <addrLine>22207</addrLine>
                    <addrLine>thowe@marymount.edu</addrLine>
                    <addrLine>lic.open.anthology@gmail.com</addrLine>
                </address>
                <availability status="free">
                    <licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Published by
                        Literature in Context under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
                        Unported License </licence>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>


            <sourceDesc>
                <biblStruct>
                    <analytic>
                        <title>"The Rambler, No. 4" Saturday, March 31, 1750</title>

                    </analytic>
                    <monogr>
                        <author>

                            <name>
                                <forename>Samuel</forename>
                                <surname>Johnson</surname>
                            </name>

                        </author>
                        <title>The Rambler</title>
                        <imprint>
                            <pubPlace>
                                <placeName type="tgn" key="7011781">London</placeName>
                            </pubPlace>
                            <publisher>Printed for J. PAYNE, and J. Boquet, in Pater-Noster Row;
                                where Letters for the RAMBLER are received.</publisher>
                            <date when="1751">c.1751</date>
                            <note>This issue appears in a two-volume collection of first printings
                                housed in the Michigan State University Special Collections;
                                accompanying page images are sourced from this first edition.</note>
                        </imprint>
                        <imprint>
                            <pubPlace>Public domain electronic facsimile copy</pubPlace>
                            <publisher>Google eBook</publisher>

                            <note>This electronic edition is a reprint of the first collected UK
                                edition, available <ref target="http://books.google.com/books?id=7ZYDAAAAQAAJ">on Google
                                    Books in facsimile</ref>.</note>
                        </imprint>
                        <extent>c30 cm (folio)</extent>
                        <biblScope>pp 19-24</biblScope>
                    </monogr>
                </biblStruct>
            </sourceDesc>

        </fileDesc>


        <profileDesc>
            <!--BEGINS Profile Description  -->
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="en">English</language>
            </langUsage>

            <creation/>

            <textDesc n="essay">
                <channel mode="w">print</channel>
                <constitution type="single">single periodical</constitution>
                <derivation type="original"/>
                <domain/>
                <factuality type="mixed"/>
                <interaction/>
                <preparedness type="revised"/>
                <purpose type="inform" degree="high"/>
                <purpose type="entertain" degree="low"/>
            </textDesc>

            <settingDesc>
                <setting>

                    <time from="1740" to="1760">mid 18th century</time>
                </setting>
            </settingDesc>
        </profileDesc>




        <encodingDesc>
            <!--BEGINS Encoding Description  -->
            <projectDesc>
                <p>This text is prepared as part of the <hi rend="italic">Literature in Context</hi>
                    project, which provides an accessible, curated, and marked-up selection of
                    primary sources relevant to the study and the teaching of British and American
                    literature of the 18th century. This project is funded by the National Endowment
                    for the Humanities and developed by faculty at The University of Virginia and
                    Marymount University. </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <interpretation>
                    <p>Research informing these annotations draws on publicly-accessible resources,
                        with links provided where possible. Annotations have also included common
                        knowledge, defined as information that can be found in multiple reliable
                        sources. If you notice an error in these annotations, please contact
                        lic.open.anthology@gmail.com. </p>
                </interpretation>
                <normalization>
                    <p>Original spelling and capitalization is retained, though the long s has been
                        silently modernized and ligatured forms are not encoded.</p>
                </normalization>
                <hyphenation>
                    <p>Hyphenation has not been retained, except where necessary for the sense of
                        the word.</p>
                </hyphenation>
                <segmentation>
                    <p>Page breaks have been retained. Catchwords, signatures, and running headers
                        have not. Where pages break in the middle of a word, the complete word has
                        been indicated prior to the page beginning.</p>
                </segmentation>
                <correction>
                    <p>Materials have been transcribed from and checked against first editions,
                        where possible. See the Sources section.</p>
                </correction>
            </editorialDecl>
            <tagsDecl>
                <namespace name="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
                    <tagUsage gi="div">Unnumbered divs used.</tagUsage>
                </namespace>
            </tagsDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy xml:id="lcnaf">
                    <bibl>Library of Congress Name Authority File</bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy xml:id="lcc">
                    <bibl>Library of Congress Classification</bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy xml:id="tgn">
                    <bibl>Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names</bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy xml:id="orcid">
                    <bibl>Open Researcher and Contributor ID</bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>


        <revisionDesc>
            <!--BEGINS Revision Description -->
            <change when="2018-06-05" who="editors.xml#TH">First complete XML version</change>
            <change when="2018-10-15" who="editors.xml#TH">Correction against first edition page
                images</change>
            <change when="2019-01-02" who="editors.xml#TH">Update note numbers</change>
            <change when="2019-01-06" who="editors.xml#TH">Update to Scaliger note; printers
                note</change>
            <change when="2019-01-18" who="editors.xml#TH">Updates to responsiblity and ID
                details</change>
            <change when="2019-01-25" who="ediotors.xml#TH">Wrapped annotated text in refs instead
                of using empty elements; other minor changes</change>
        </revisionDesc>


    </teiHeader>
    <!--TEI Header Ends -->






    <text>
        <front>
            <titlePage>
                <pb n="[19]" facs="pageImages/19.jpg"/>
                <titlePart>THE <lb/>RAMBLER.<lb/>
                </titlePart>
                <titlePart>NUMB. 4. <ref target="_price" corresp="price">Price 2 <hi rend="italic">d</hi>.</ref>
                    <note xml:id="price" target="_price" resp="editors.xml#TH">This issue cost two pence. In the eighteenth-century coinage system, 12
                        pence made a shilling, and 20 shillings made a pound. According to the <ref target="https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/static/Coinage.jsp#costofliving">Old Bailey Online</ref>, "A waterman would expect six pence to take you
                        from Westminster to London Bridge, while a barber asked the same to dress
                        your wig and give you a shave." While two pence was not out of reach for
                        most people, the publication frequency of <hi rend="italic">The Rambler</hi>
                        and similar items would make regular personal purchasing out of the realm of
                        possibility for most. However, men might read a copy in a coffeeshop, entry
                        to which, in the seventeenth century, was a penny. For a deeper look at
                        money, purchasing power, and income, see <ref target="https://hlq.pennpress.org/media/34098/hlq-774_p373_hume.pdf">Robert Hume's article "The Value of Money in Eighteenth-Century
                            England: Incomes, Prices, Buying Power—-and Some Problems in Cultural
                            Economics"</ref> in <hi rend="italic">Huntington Library Quarterly</hi>
                        (2015).</note>
                    <lb/>
                </titlePart>
                <lb/>
                <docImprint>
                    <docDate>SATURDAY, 31 March 1750</docDate>
                    <lb/>
                    <hi rend="italic">To be
                        Continued on </hi>TUESDAYS <hi rend="italic">and</hi>
                    SATURDAYS<lb/>
                </docImprint>
                <epigraph>
                    <quote>
                        <lb/>
                        <ref target="_epigraph" corresp="epigraph">
                            <hi rend="italic">Simul et
                                jucunda et idonea dicere Vitae.</hi>
                        </ref>
                        <note xml:id="epigraph" target="_epigraph" resp="editors.xml#TH">From Horace's <ref target="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0065%3Acard%3D309">Ars Poetica 334</ref>: 'to deliver at once both the pleasures and
                            the necessaries of life" (Perseus Project).</note>
                    </quote>
                    <bibl>
                        <ref target="_Horace" corresp="Horace">
                            <persName type="lccn" key="n79081354">HOR[ace]</persName>
                        </ref>
                        <note xml:id="Horace" target="_Horace" resp="editors.xml#TH">
                            <graphic url="notes/Horace-bronze-medal-Bibliotheque-Nationale-Paris.jpg"/>Quintus Horatius Flaccus, or Horace, was a Roman lyric poet of the 1st
                            century BCE. The image above is a broze portrait medal containing his
                            likeness, dating to the 4th century CE, housed in the Bibliothèque
                            Nationale, Paris (<ref target="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Horace-Roman-poet">Encyclopedia Britannica</ref>). </note>
                    </bibl>
                </epigraph>
            </titlePage>
        </front>
        <body>
            <p>THE Works of Fiction, with which the present Generation seems more particularly
                delighted, are such as exhibit Life in its true State, diversified only by Accidents
                that daily happen in the World, and influenced by those Passions and Qualities which
                are really to be found in conversing with Mankind. </p>
            <p>THIS Kind of Writing may be termed not improperly the Comedy of Romance, and is to be
                conducted nearly by the Rules of Comic Poetry. Its Province is to bring about
                natural Events by easy Means, and to keep up Curiosity without the Help of Wonder:
                it is therefore precluded from the Machines and Expedients of the <ref target="_heroic" corresp="heroic">Heroic Romance</ref>, <note xml:id="heroic" target="_heroic" resp="editors.xml#TH">Heroic romance is a genre that flourished
                    during the 17th century and remained popular, as parodied by Charlotte Lennox in
                        <hi rend="italic">The Female Quixote</hi>, into the 18th. It had a profound
                    influence on the development of the novel, though many writers of the 18th
                    century would work to dissociate the genres, as Johnson does here. Formaally
                    loose in structure, heroic romances also "deliberately eschew[ed]
                    contemporaneity"; their plots featured courtly lovers engaged in "heroic stories
                    of love and war in a remote and idealized past" (<ref target="https://books.google.com/books?id=FPdRAwAAQBAJ">Shellinger, <hi rend="italic">Encyclopedia of the Novel</hi>, 1046)</ref>. Some
                    representative heroic romances include <hi rend="italic">Euphues</hi> by John
                    Lyly, <hi rend="italic">L'Astree</hi> by Honore d'Urfe, and <hi rend="italic">Clelie</hi> by Madame de Scudery.</note> and can neither employ Giants to
                snatch away a Lady from the nuptial Rites, nor Knights to bring her back from
                Captivity; it can neither bewilder its Personages in Desarts, nor lodge them in
                imaginary Castles. </p>
            <p>I REMEMBER a Remark made by <hi rend="italic">
                    <ref target="_Scaliger" corresp="Scaliger">
                        <persName type="lccn" key="n88631189">
                            Scaliger</persName>
                    </ref>
                    <note xml:id="Scaliger" target="_Scaliger" resp="editors.xml#TH">
                        <ref target="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julius-Caesar-Scaliger">Julius Caesar Scaliger</ref> (1484-1558) was a Franco-Italian humanist
                        polymath most widely-known for his <hi rend="italics">Poetices Libri
                            Septem</hi> (1561). For more information on the <hi rend="italic">Poetices</hi>, see <ref target="https://www.jstor.org/stable/434244">Bernard Weinberg's "Scaliger versus Aristotle on Poetics" (1942)</ref>
                        and <ref target="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3654274">this review by David
                            Marsh of a new edition and German translation of the whole</ref>.
                        Scaliger critiques the poetry of Italian humanist <ref target="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Giovanni-Pontano">Giovanni
                            Pontano (1429-1503).</ref>
                    </note>
                </hi> upon <hi rend="italic">
                    <persName type="lccn" key="n84185908">Potanus</persName>
                </hi>, that all his Writings are filled with Images, and
                that <pb n="20" facs="pageImages/20.jpg"/> if you take from him his Lillies and his
                Roses, his Satyrs and his Dryads, he will have nothing left that can be called
                Poetry. In like Manner, almost all the Fictions of the last Age will vanish, if you
                deprive them of a Hermit and a Wood, a Battle and a Shipwreck. </p>
            <p>WHY this wild Strain of Imagination found Reception so long, in polite and learned
                Ages, it is not easy to conceive; but we cannot wonder that, while Readers could be
                procured, the Authors were willing to continue it: For when a Man had, by Practice,
                gained some Fluency of Language, he had no farther Care than to retire to his <ref target="_closet" corresp="closet">Closet</ref>
                <note xml:id="closet" target="_closet" resp="editors.xml#TH">
                    <graphic url="notes/1GreenCloset.png"/>In the eighteenth century, a "closet" was a small office or
                    private room leading off of a bedroom; here, individuals would conduct business,
                    write letters, read, or converse with close acquaintances. It was not used to
                    store clothes. For more information, see <hi rend="italic">Daily Life in
                        18th-Century England</hi> (85-86), or <ref target="https://english.illinoisstate.edu/digitaldefoe/teaching/bobker/overview.html">Danielle Bobker's "Literature and Culture of the Closet in the Eighteenth
                        Century,"</ref> from which site the accompanying image, showing the Green
                    Closet at Frogmore, has been drawn.</note>, let loose his Invention, and heat
                his Mind with Incredibilities; and a Book was thus produced without Fear of
                Criticism, without the Toil of Study, without Knowledge of Nature, or Acquaintance
                with Life. </p>
            <p> THE Task of our present Writers is very different; it requires, together with that
                Learning which is to be gained from Books, that Experience which can never be
                attained by solitary Diligence, but must arise from general Converse, and accurate
                Observation of the living World. Their Performances have, as <hi rend="italic">
                    <persName type="lccn" key="n79081354">Horace </persName>
                </hi> expresses it,
                    <hi rend="italic">
                    <ref target="_plus_oneris" corresp="plus_oneris">plus oneris
                        quantum veniae minus,</ref>
                    <note xml:id="plus_oneris" target="_plus_oneris" resp="editors.xml#TH">
                        <ref target="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0539%3Abook%3D2%3Apoem%3D1">In Horace's <hi rend="italic">Epistles</hi> 2.1</ref>, this quote
                        appears at line 170. In this epistle to Augustus, Horace is mounting a
                        defense of contemporary poetry and decrying the poor taste of the public. In
                        particular he argues that though comic subjects are thought easier to write,
                        they are actually more challenging than tragic subjects because readers give
                        them less "indulgence." Johnson will put this "indulgence" in terms of the
                        readers' familiarity with the more common subjects of comedy (Perseus
                        Project).</note>
                </hi> little Indulgence, and therefore more Difficulty. They
                are engaged in Portraits of which every one knows the Original, and can detect any
                Deviation from Exactness of Resemblance. Other Writings are safe, except from the
                Malice of Learning; but these are in danger from every common Reader; <ref target="_Pliny" corresp="Pliny">as the Slipper ill executed was censured by a
                    Shoemaker</ref>
                <note xml:id="Pliny" target="_Pliny" resp="editors.xml#TH">Johnson alludes here to a
                    story from <ref target="http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0978.phi001.perseus-eng1:35.36">Pliny the Elder's <hi rend="italic">Natural History</hi>
                    (35.36)</ref>.</note> who happened to stop in his way at the <hi rend="italic">
                    <ref target="_Venus" corresp="Venus">Venus</ref>
                    <note xml:id="Venus" target="_Venus" resp="editors.xml#TH">Roman counterpart to the Greek goddess
                        Aphrodite, Venus is a signifier of love, sex, propsperity, and desire (<ref target="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_%28mythology%29">Wikipedia</ref>).</note>
                </hi> of <ref target="_Apelles" corresp="Apelles">Apelles.</ref>
                <note xml:id="Apelles" target="_Apelles" resp="editors.xml#TH">Apelles of Kos, a Greek painter of the 4th century BCE
                        (<ref target="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apelles">Wikipedia</ref>).
                    Johnson here alludes to a lost painting of Venus Anadyomenes, or Venus rising
                    from the sea.</note>
            </p>
            <p>BUT the Danger of not being approved as just Copyers of human Manners, is not the
                most important Apprehension that an author of this Sort ought to have before him.
                    <ref target="_audience" corresp="audience">These Books are written chiefly to
                    the Young, the Ignorant, and the Idle,</ref>
                <note xml:id="audience" target="_audience" resp="editors.xml#TH">This is one of the most-quoted moments
                    in the essay. Here, Johnson is making the case that the young, untutored,
                    inexperienced minds that form the primary audience of the novel are easily led
                    astray by the familiarity of their subjects and the verisimilitude of their
                    style.</note> to whom they serve as Lectures of Conduct, and Introductions into
                Life. They are the Entertainment of Minds unfurnished with Ideas, and therefore <pb n="21" facs="pageImages/21.jpg"/> easily susceptible of Impressions; not fixed
                by Principles, and therefore easily following the Current of Fancy; not informed by
                Experience, and consequently open to every false Suggestion and partial Account. </p>
            <p> THAT the highest Degree of Reverence should be paid to Youth, and that nothing
                indecent or unseemly should be suffered to approach their Eyes or Ears, are Precepts
                extorted by Sense and Virtue from an ancient Writer by no Means eminent for Chastity
                of Thought. The same Kind, tho' not the same Degree of Caution, is required in every
                thing which is laid before them, to secure them from unjust Prejudices, perverse
                Opinions, and improper Combinations of Images. </p>
            <p> IN the Romances formerly written, every Transaction and Sentiment was so remote from
                all that passes among Men, that the Reader was in very little danger of making any
                Applications to himself; the Virtues and Crimes were equally beyond his Sphere of
                Activity; and he amused himself with Heroes and with Traitors, Deliverers and
                Persecutors, as with Beings of another Species, whose Actions were regulated upon
                Motives of their own, and who had neither Faults nor Excellences in common with
                himself. </p>
            <p> BUT when an Adventurer is levelled with the rest of the World, and acts in such
                Scenes of the universal Drama, as may be the Lot of any other Man; young Spectators
                fix their Eyes upon him with closer Attention, and hope by observing his Behaviour
                and Success to regulate their own Practices, when they shall be engaged in the like
                Part. </p>
            <p>FOR this Reason these <ref target="_histories" corresp="histories">familiar
                    Histories</ref>
                <note xml:id="histories" target="_histories" resp="editors.xml#TH">Johnson here uses the term "familiar history" to describe
                    the probable fictions produced by "our present Writers." The term suggests the
                    truth-value associated with many eighteenth-century fictions that, like <hi rend="italic">Robinson Crusoe</hi> (1719) or <hi rend="italic">Pamela</hi>
                    (1740), were advertised as having been largely written by the characters
                    themselves. These are supposedly true histories, memoirs, or other accounts of
                    people who would seem familiar to contemporary audiences.</note> may perhaps be
                made of greater Use than the Solemnities of professed Morality, and convey the
                Knowledge of Vice and Virtue with more Efficacy than Axioms and Definitions. <ref target="_possession" corresp="possession">But if the Power of Example is so
                    great, as to take Possession of the Memory by a kind of Violence, and produce
                    Effects almost without the Intervention of the Will,</ref>
                <note xml:id="possession" target="_possession" resp="editors.xml#TH"> Here Johnson
                    argues that representations which are rendered in so familiar and realistic a
                    manner are especially dangerous to untutored minds because they seem to be truth
                    rather than fiction; he therefore cautions that authors provide the best models
                    for behavior and the cultivation of the mind. Johnson references
                    eighteenth-century thought about the power of the imagination to affect the body
                    regardless of the will, like that discussed by <ref target="https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Complete_Essays_of_Montaigne/KMoYEWULo2UC">Michele de Montaigne in "Of the Power of the Imagination."</ref> For
                    information about the power of the female imagination to create monstrous
                    beings, see, among other works, <ref target="https://books.google.com/books?id=_nQredXpwaUC">Marie Hélène Huet's
                            <hi rend="italic">Monstrous Imagination</hi> (1993)</ref>.</note> Care
                ought <pb n="22" facs="pageImages/22.jpg"/> to be taken that, when the Choice is
                unrestrained, the best Examples only should be exhibited; and that which is likely
                to operate so strongly, should not be mischievous or uncertain in its Effects. </p>
            <p> THE chief Advantages which these Fictions have over real Life is, that their Authors
                are at liberty, tho' not to invent, yet to select Objects, and to cull from the Mass
                of Mankind, those Individuals upon which the Attention ought most to be employ'd; as
                a Diamond, though it cannot be made, may be polished by Art, and placed in such a
                Situation, as to display that Lustre which before was buried among common Stones. </p>
            <p> IT is justly considered as the greatest Excellency of Art, to imitate Nature; but it
                is necessary to distinguish those Parts of Nature, which are most proper for
                Imitation: Greater Care is still required in representing Life, which is so often
                discoloured by Passion, or deformed by Wickedness. If the World be <ref target="_promiscuous" corresp="promiscuous">promiscuously</ref>
                <note xml:id="promiscuous" target="_promiscuous" resp="editors.xml#TH">"Promiscuous"
                    here refers to a lack of distinction or discrimination; it is not primarily
                    sexual. See this <ref target="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=promiscuous">Google
                        N-Gram graph charting the usage of the term over time</ref>.</note>
                described, I cannot see of what Use it can be to read the Account; or why it may not
                be as safe to turn the Eye immediately upon Mankind, as upon a Mirrour which shows
                all that presents itself without Discrimination. </p>
            <p> IT is therefore not a sufficient Vindication of a Character, that it is drawn as it
                appears; for many Characters ought never to be drawn; nor of a Narrative, that the
                Train of Events is agreeable to Observation and Experience; for that Observation
                which is called Knowledge of the World, will be found much more frequently to make
                Men cunning than good. The Purpose of these Writings is surely not only to show
                Mankind, but to provide that they may be seen hereafter with less Hazard; to teach
                the means of avoiding the Snares which are laid by TREACHERY for INNOCENCE, without
                infusing any Wish for that Superiority with which the Betrayer flatters his Vanity;
                to give the Power of counteracting Fraud without the Temptation to practise it; to
                initiate Youth by mock Encounters in the Art of necessary Defense, and <ref target="_increase" corresp="increase">to increase Prudence without impairing
                    Virtue.</ref>
                <note xml:id="increase" target="_increase" resp="editors.xml#TH">In
                    this passage, Johnson articulates his sense of the purpose of novelistic
                    writing. For him, the purpose of fiction is education, as it provides a kind of
                    experience that is protected from the dangers that might accompany such actions
                    in real life.</note>
                <pb n="23" facs="pageImages/23.jpg"/>
            </p>
            <p>MANY Writers, for the sake of following Nature, so mingle good and bad Qualities in
                their principal Personages, that they are both equally conspicuous; and as we
                accompany them through their Adventures with Delight, and are led by Degrees to
                interest ourselves in their Favour, we lose the Abhorrence of their Faults, because
                they do not hinder our Pleasure, or, perhaps, regard them with some Kindness for
                being united with so much Merit. </p>
            <p>THERE have been Men indeed splendidly wicked, whose Endowments threw a Brightness on
                their Crimes, and whom scarce any Villainy made perfectly detestable, because they
                never could be wholly divested of their Excellencies; but such have been in all Ages
                the great Corruptors of the World, and their Resemblance ought no more to be
                preserved, than the Art of murdering without Pain.</p>
            <p> SOME have advanced, without due Attention to the Consequences of this Notion, that
                certain Virtues have their correspondent Faults, and therefore that to exhibit
                either apart is to deviate from Probability. Thus Men are observed by <hi rend="italic">
                    <ref target="_Swift" corresp="Swift">
                        <persName type="lccn" key="n78096912">Swift</persName>
                    </ref>
                    <note xml:id="Swift" target="_Swift" resp="editors.xml#TH">
                        <graphic url="notes/Gullivers_travels.jpeg"/>Jonathan Swift, an Anglo-Irish satiric author of the early 18th century,
                        is most well-known today for writing <hi rend="italic">Gulliver's
                            Travels</hi>. The title page to the first edition of <hi rend="italic">Gulliver's Travels</hi>, reproduced from Wikimedia Commons, is above.
                        For more information on Swift, see <ref target="https://www.tcd.ie/trinitywriters/writers/jonathan-swift/">this
                            biographical essay by Ian Campbell Ross (2016)</ref>, and readers may
                        also be interested in <ref target="https://www.tcd.ie/library/exhibitions/swift/">this 2017 online
                            exhibition about Swift from the Library of Trinity College,
                        Dublin</ref>.</note> to be <ref target="_grateful" corresp="grateful">grateful in the same Degree as they are resentful.</ref>
                    <note xml:id="grateful" target="_grateful" resp="editors.xml#TH">From the second
                        volume of the <hi rend="italic">Miscellanies</hi>, compiled by Jonathan
                        Swift and Alexander Pope, this particular quotation is from <ref target="http://estc.bl.uk/T39472">Thoughts on Various Subjects,"</ref> a
                        collection of witty aphorisms by Pope and contained in the second
                        volume.</note>
                </hi> This Principle, with others of the same Kind, supposes
                Man to act from a brute Impulse, and persue a certain Degree of Inclination, without
                any Choice of the Object; for, otherwise, though it should be allowed that Gratitude
                and Resentment arise from the same Constitution of the Passions, it follows not that
                they will be equally indulged when Reason is consulted; yet unless that Consequence
                be admitted, this sagacious Maxim becomes an empty Sound, without any Relation to
                Practice or to Life.</p>
            <p>NOR is it evident that even the first Motions to these Effects are always in the same
                Proportion. For Pride, which produces Quickness of Resentment, will frequently
                obstruct Gratitude, by Unwillingness to admit that Inferiority which Obligation
                implies; and it is very unlikely, that he who cannot think he receives a Favour will
                ever acknowledge it.</p>
            <pb n="24" facs="pageImages/24.jpg"/>
            <p>IT is of the utmost Importance to Mankind, that Positions of this Tendency should be
                laid open and confuted; for while Men consider Good and Evil as springing from the
                same Root, they will spare the one for the sake of the other, and in judging, if not
                of others at least of themselves, will be apt to estimate their Virtues by their
                Vices. To this fatal Error all those will contribute, who confound the Colours of
                Right and Wrong, and instead of helping to settle their Boundaries, mix them with so
                much Art, that no common Mind is able to disunite them. </p>
            <p> IN Narratives, where historical Veracity has no Place, I cannot discover why there
                should not be exhibited the most perfect Idea of Virtue; of Virtue not angelical,
                nor above Probability; for what we cannot credit we shall never imitate; but the
                highest and purest Kind that Humanity can reach, which, when exercised in such
                Trials as the various Revolutions of Things shall bring upon it, may, by conquering
                some Calamities, and enduring others, teach us what we may hope, and what we can
                perform. Vice, for Vice is necessary to be shewn, should always disgust; nor should
                the Graces of Gaiety, or the Dignity of Courage, be so united with it, as to
                reconcile it to the Mind. Wherever it appears, it should raise Hatred by the
                Malignity of its Practices; and Contempt, by the Meanness of its Stratagems; for
                while it is supported by either <ref target="_parts" corresp="parts">Parts</ref>
                <note xml:id="parts" target="_parts" resp="editors.xml#TH">According
                    to the <hi rend="italic">Oxford English Dictionary</hi>, "part" used in this
                    sense (II.15) refers to "A personal quality or attribute, esp. of an
                    intellectual kind; an ability, gift, or talent."</note> or Spirit, it will be
                seldom heartily abhorred. The <hi rend="italic">Roman</hi> Tyrant was content to be
                hated, if he was but feared; and there are Thousands of the Readers of Romances
                willing to be thought wicked, if they may be allowed to be <ref target="_wits" corresp="wits">Wits.</ref>
                <note xml:id="wits" target="_wits" resp="editors.xml#TH">To be a "wit" in the eighteenth century was to be clever.
                    But it could also be a term of derision, referring to a set of people who
                    claimed false cleverness. Here, Johnson is suggesting that such people would
                    rather be thought by others to be clever, even at the expense of being thought
                    wicked. See <ref target="http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/C18Guide.pdf">Jack
                        Lynch's "Guide to Eighteenth-Century Vocabulary,"</ref> which includes a
                    definition of this word.</note> It is therefore to be always inculcated, that
                Virtue is the highest Proof of a superior Understanding, and the only solid Basis of
                Greatness; and that Vice is the natural Consequence of narrow Thoughts; that it
                begins in Mistake, and ends in Ignominy. </p>

        </body>
        <back>
            <div>
                <p>
                    <hi rend="italic">LONDON:</hi>
                </p>
                <p>Printed for <ref target="_publishers" corresp="publishers">J. PAYNE, and J.
                        BOQUET, in Pater-noster-Row</ref>
                    <note xml:id="publishers" target="_publishers" resp="editors.xml#TH">Publishers John Payne and Joseph
                        Boquet joined forces at mid-century, working from the center of the English
                        book trade in Paternoster Row. The pair published <hi rend="italic">The
                            Rambler</hi> from 1750, bringing them much profit. It is said that the
                        publishers offered Johnson the astonishing sum of 2 guineas per issue. For a
                        brief overview of the printers, see footnote 2 to a 1750 letter between
                        Samuel Johnson and Charlotte Lennox (4), discussing the publication of her
                            <hi rend="italic">Poems</hi>, in <ref target="https://books.google.com/books?id=U_FEAwAAQBAJ">Norbert
                            Schürer's <hi rend="italic">Charlotte Lennox: Correspondence and
                                Miscellaneous Documents</hi>
                        </ref>.</note>;</p>
                <p>where Letters for the RAMBLER are received.</p>
            </div>
        </back>
    </text>
</TEI>